Mole Removal - Can I Just Laser It Off?

In the clinic, I often meet patients who ask if a mole can “just be lasered off.” It sounds simple - quick, clean, no downtime. But when it comes to moles, the right approach depends on what the lesion truly is. Sometimes, it’s not just about removing what’s visible - it’s about knowing what lies beneath.

Case 1 - The Mole That Might Not Be a Mole

A GP referred a patient for a dark lesion on the left ear, concerned it might be melanoma. The patient had Fitzpatrick IV skin, which made photo triage unreliable - the lesion blended with surrounding pigment and texture.

Because of the GP’s concern, I recommended in-person evaluation and, if indicated, same-day excision with local flap reconstruction under local anaesthesia - allowing complete removal, immediate repair, and histology. The patient chose the subsidised referral via polyclinic pathway, which is reasonable. (For medically indicated lesions managed privately, Medisave and/or insurance can often offset costs.)

Key point: when melanoma cannot be excluded, laser is inappropriate - it destroys diagnostic tissue and affects future management plans.

Case 2 - When Laser Is the Right Tool

A Fitzpatrick II–III female came after multiple laser sessions elsewhere for flat “moles” on the forearms that only lightened slightly. She also had two slightly raised peri-oral moles (one on the philtrum, one next to the lower lip) and asked if these could be lasered too.

We started afresh: history, physical examination, and documentation to remove diagnostic uncertainty. Clinical assessment was in keeping with benign naevi, so I proceeded with CO₂ laser excision under topical anaesthesia:

• Philtrum mole: treated to allow cosmetically sensitive secondary intention healing in the natural concavity.

• Lower lip mole: lasered off entirely, with acceptance that a trace of pigment might remain. In this case, because the mole was slightly bigger, I decided to put in a couple of fine stitches to close the wound for a better cosmetic result.

• Forearm flat moles: a focused repeat CO₂ session, with counselling on post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) risk given her skin type.

This illustrates that laser can be appropriate - when the diagnosis is clear, expectations are aligned, and technique is tailored.

Why Histology and Context Matter

• You cannot always reliably separate benign from malignant by appearance alone, especially across skin tones

• Histopathology provides diagnostic certainty when there’s doubt and guides follow-up

• Method selection (laser, shave, excision) should consider depth, site, skin type, scar tolerance, and diagnostic needs - not convenience

Takeaway

“Just lasering it off” may sound convenient - but what’s quick isn’t always safe. The best results come from clear diagnosis first, then a method matched to lesion biology, location, skin type, and patient priorities.

If you’re considering mole removal, ask:

1. Will tissue be sent for histology if needed?

2. Is this complete removal or surface-only?

3. How will scarring, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) risk, and follow-up be managed?

When in doubt, see a Plastic Surgeon or a Dermatologist who can balance medical safety and aesthetic precision.

Written by Dr Ng Zhi Yang, Singapore Plastic Surgeon, and Founder & Medical Director of Doctor Stitch, a specialist-led cosmetic surgery aftercare service.