Welcome!
Face & Neck Lift

Face and neck lift surgery addresses skin laxity and structural descent of the lower face and neck.
It may be appropriate where age-related changes are not improved by non-surgical measures. The focus is on determining whether surgery is appropriate and whether expectations are realistic.
My Approach
Facial ageing is not merely about skin laxity - it involves gradual descent of deeper supporting structures and changes in soft-tissue volume. The goal of a face and neck lift is therefore not to pull, but to restore. My approach follows the principles of preservation surgery, where the natural anatomical layers are lifted in continuity rather than being separated or excised unnecessarily.
This method allows the face to move as one cohesive unit, maintaining natural expression and character. It results in less swelling, faster recovery, and longer-lasting harmony between the face and neck.
For comprehensive rejuvenation, face and neck lifts can be performed alongside nanofat rejuvenation, upper and lower blepharoplasty, or a rhinoplasty, depending on each patient’s anatomy and goals. This integrated approach restores both form and volume, achieving balanced, natural renewal rather than isolated improvement.
Planning & Technique
In suitable patients, I perform a preservation deep-plane lift, where the dissection is carried out beneath the SMAS (superficial musculoaponeurotic system) while preserving key structures. This addresses not only the lower face, but also the midface and undereye areas - inherent limitations of the traditional deep-plane approach.
I learned this technique from my colleague in Paris, whom I have known since our research fellowship days at Harvard and Massachusetts General Hospital. His mentorship and precision-oriented philosophy deeply shaped how I now approach facial rejuvenation - with respect for anatomy and restraint in dissection.
I perform my face and neck lifts with the haemostatic net, which has been proven to reduce the risks of blood clots and obviates the need for drains.

The preservation approach reduces the need for excessive separation of the skin in the face and neck area, thereby lowering the risk of bleeding and skin necrosis. It also promotes faster recovery and a more natural result - after all, peeling the skin of a fruit and then laying it back down would never look quite the same. Importantly, the preservation approach also reduces both the need for and risks associated with submandibular gland procedures, without compromising results. These benefits were all reported in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery by my colleague in Paris recently.
A non-surgical alternative that I perform, in the appropriate and carefully selected patient, is to use microbotox.Every patient’s anatomy and goals are different. Dr Ng will discuss the best approach for you during your consultation.
Recovery & Expectations
Most patients return home the same day or after an overnight stay, especially if drains are used. Swelling and tightness are expected early on but generally improve within two to three weeks. Gentle lymphatic care, proper rest, and adherence to post-operative instructions such as keeping head elevation will all help to optimise recovery.
Final refinement of facial contour and tone continues over several months as tissues heal and settle naturally. My focus is to ensure recovery feels as calm and deliberate as the surgery itself.
Post-operative care extends beyond routine reviews - it is an integral part of Dr Ng’s surgical philosophy. Through Doctor Stitch, an aftercare service founded to ensure seamless continuity and comfort, every patient is followed up personally by Dr Ng for attentive, discreet, and consistent care throughout the recovery journey.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Will a preservation approach look natural?
Yes, by lifting deeper tissues in continuity and respecting the natural anatomical relationships, movement feels cohesive rather than pulled, and expression is preserved. The goal is restoration, not correction. A well-performed preservation facelift should be undetectable as surgery.
2. When is face and neck lift surgery appropriate?
When structural descent of the lower face and neck creates visible laxity that affects proportion and identity, not simply surface-level skin redundancy that has not been assessed properly. Age alone is not an indication. The right candidate is someone whose concerns are structural, whose expectations are realistic, and who understands that surgery restores rather than stops ageing.
3. Can it be combined with other procedures?
Yes, fat grafting, blepharoplasty, rhinoplasty, and skin resurfacing can all be performed alongside a preservation face and neck lift depending on each patient's anatomy and goals. A combined approach often produces more balanced and lasting full-face rejuvenation than isolated procedures.
4. What is the haemostatic net and do you use it?
The haemostatic net is a technique first described by Auersvald et al in which a lattice of quilting sutures is placed on the skin flap to obliterate the dead space between the skin and the underlying SMAS, eliminating the conditions in which a haematoma can form. It has since been validated in larger series and shown to reduce haematoma rates significantly without compromising flap viability. I use it selectively, in patients undergoing deep plane and extended dissections where the risk of fluid accumulation is higher, as it allows more predictable tissue adherence, better skin redraping, and in many cases eliminates the need for post-operative drains.
5. Is a neck lift alone ever appropriate?
Almost never in isolation for a patient seeking rejuvenation, as an isolated neck lift without addressing the lower face typically produces an imbalanced result. The facial descent remains while the neck appears corrected. However, in younger patients with good skin elasticity who present with submental fat excess and early platysmal laxity rather than structural facial descent, an anterior-only approach for submental lipectomy with/without platysmaplasty is a valid, less invasive option that addresses the concern without committing to a full facelift. Patient selection is critical and will be assessed at consultation.
6. I've had fillers, biostimulators, or energy-based treatments. Does that affect my facelift?
There is debate in the literature about whether prior non-surgical treatments affect facelift surgery. A survey of Aesthetic Society members found that just over half reported increased technical difficulty in patients with a history of repetitive panfacial fillers, most commonly due to tissue plane distortion (Aesthet Surg J. 2023). However, a more recent study found no significant increase in complications in patients with a history of injectables or energy-based devices (J Cosm Derm. 2026). My position is straightforward: patients who have exhausted non-surgical options and are now ready for surgery should not be turned away on the basis of prior treatments. The planes may require more careful dissection but as a plastic surgeon, that's part of the job.
7. What about thread lifts as an alternative?
I would caution against what might be perceived as "glorified" open thread lifts. In my experience, these procedures involve visible incisions for thread placement and are marketed as a middle ground between non-surgical and surgical rejuvenation. The results are not long-lasting, the trade-off in terms of scarring is real, and I have seen patients with significant and avoidable scarring from these procedures. If you are considering a surgical approach, a properly performed face and neck lift by a well-trained plastic surgeon is a more reliable and durable investment than a procedure that promises surgical results through a non-surgical framework.
Related Reading
-
My blog post on facelift related issues I commonly see following overseas procedures
-
Nanofat - a regenerative technique that can complement facial surgery by improving skin quality and radiance
References
-
Auersvald A, Auersvald LA. Hemostatic net in rhytidoplasty: an efficient and safe method for preventing hematoma in 405 consecutive patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014 Feb;38(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00266-013-0202-5. Epub 2013 Aug 16. PMID: 23949130.
-
Sadati K, Mathieu O, Cetrulo CL Jr, Lellouch AG. Advancements in Face Lift Techniques: Preservation Face Lift With a Rotating Pedicle Flap. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Mar 18;13(3):e6619. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006619. PMID: 40104381; PMCID: PMC11918738.
-
Ng ZY, Lellouch AG. Use of Micro Botulinum Toxin for a Face-lifting Effect: A Systematic Review. Dermatol Surg. 2022 Aug 1;48(8):849-854. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003483. Epub 2022 May 12. PMID: 35560135.
-
Janssen TJ, Maheshwari K, Sivadasan A, Waterhouse N. Hemostatic Net in Facelift Surgery: A 5-Year Single-Surgeon Experience. Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Sep 14;43(10):1106-1111. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad097. PMID: 37040449.
-
Zins JE, Fardo D. The "anterior-only" approach to neck rejuvenation: an alternative to face lift surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 May;115(6):1761-8. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000161681.00637.82. PMID: 15861088.
-
Sweis L, DeRoss L, Raman S, Patel P. Potential Effects of Repetitive Panfacial Filler Injections on Facelift Surgery and Surgical Outcomes: Survey Results of the Members of The Aesthetic Society. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023 Feb 6;5:ojad010. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad010. Erratum in: Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023 Mar 27;5:ojad025. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad025. PMID: 36860684; PMCID: PMC9969530.
-
Myers B, Firsowicz M, Kamrani P, Dayan S, Fabi S. Injectables and Facelifts: Can We Coexist? A Retrospective Chart Review Assessing Injectable Treatments Preceding and Following Rhytidectomy. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2026 Feb;25(2):e70690. doi: 10.1111/jocd.70690. PMID: 41664552; PMCID: PMC12887548.
